Pomona, a student organization advocating
for fossil fuel divestment at Pomona College, distributed a letter Jan. 18 among faculty members to enlist support for divestment in preparation
for their upcoming presentation to the Board of Trustees Feb. 26. The letter, which was drafted by Meagan
Tokunaga PO ’15 and Eliza Burke PO ’18 and revised by John Jurewitz, a
lecturer in economics at Pomona, had received 40 faculty signatures as of
Pomona members plan to deliver the letter, which calls for the Board of Trustees to reconsider
divesting the college’s endowment from fossil fuels, during the Feb. 26 presentation. Tokunaga and Burke said that they wrote
the letter to demonstrate faculty support for an open, inclusive dialogue about
letter asks that the Board of Trustees “explore more nuanced and creative
approaches that would result in a socially responsible pattern of portfolio
investments and uses of college funds.”
said that he encouraged the Divest Pomona students to write a “conservative,
needs to get people back to the table to talk,” he said. “If it’s a
confrontational letter, it’s too easily dismissed.”
and Burke said that their letter has received positive responses from faculty
faculty who aren’t necessarily supportive of divestment initially are very
supportive of the letter, and they agree that the college didn’t give the issue
enough attention,” Tokunaga said. “It’s more about how decisions are made at
the college and really incorporating the different actors involved.”
Menefee-Libey, politics professor and chair of Pomona’s Faculty Executive
Committee, hopes that the faculty can convene a forum about divestment in
challenge is going to be to do it in a way that is productive [and] isn’t just
a conversation for our own edification,” Menefee-Libey added.
to Menefee-Libey, many faculty members are concerned about the broader
questions of divestment and climate change. Char Miller, W. M. Keck Professor
of Environmental Analysis at Pomona, and Rick Hazlett, environmental studies and geology professor and coordinator of the environmental analysis program, both characterized climate change as an urgent
problem for our times.
message [of divestment] is that all of us in our collective and individual
lives need to begin to think through and actually take steps to correct our
dependence on fossil fuels,” Miller said. “There is no better place for that
kind of conversation than an academic environment.”
agreed that the college has a moral obligation to take action.
“The question for the college should at
least be, ‘If we don’t divest to get the message out there, what are we going to
do?’” Hazlett said.
Jurewitz hoped that the Board of
Trustees will reevaluate the possibilities for divestiture and other forms of
action against climate change.
think they looked at a fairly narrow question: 100 percent divestiture or not, all or
nothing,” Jurewitz said. “I understand your response, but now let’s talk about the
middle ground, what else might possibly be done.”
David Oxtoby emphasized that although the college opted not to divest in 2013,
it has taken measures to increase sustainability, including committing to net
carbon neutrality by 2030 and investing in clean tech funds.
are many ways in which we can work with students to create change, from
improving our practices on energy use on campus to intellectual engagement in
the classroom that can lead to new breakthroughs in energy to developing bold,
new leaders committed to working on climate change at the national and global
levels,” Oxtoby wrote in an email to TSL.
preparation for the Feb. 26 Board of Trustees meeting, Divest Pomona will hold an
event Feb. 13 for “Global Divestment Day” where students will read letters
about their reasons for supporting divestment and Jurewitz will read the letter
he helped draft. The event will also include a mock Board of Trustees presentation.